The only remotely usable eyepiece bundled with the Luminova 114 is the 25mm Huygens, and even it really belongs in the garbage. The eyepieces are all plastic, as is the Barlow – this includes the lenses used in them, as well. The eyepiece and Barlow are way too poorly made to function well at this power (or at all), and the scope is simply too small to function at anything above 225x magnification at most. The scope is of course too small to achieve 675x without producing a dim, blurry image – my 20” telescope, at twenty times the cost, ten times the weight, and 4.4 times the aperture, still struggled at this magnification due to atmospheric seeing. The scope also comes with a 3x Barlow which, when used in conjunction with the 4mm Ramsden, will provide the “675x” advertised on the box. The Luminova 114 comes with three eyepieces: A 25mm Huygens (36x), 12.5mm Huygens, (72x), and a 4mm Ramsden (225x). The supplied eyepieces with almost every telescope tend to be on the cheap side, especially with ones sold for below $200, but the Tasco Luminova scopes come with ones that are such an absolute failure that they make the telescope unusable. The bracket is also poorly made and the finder is near-impossible to align as a result. The objective is a single plastic element, as is the eyepiece, and the thing’s aperture is stopped down to fix the resulting aberrations plaguing the dreadful optics. The scope’s finder is a pitiful 5×24 unit. However, like that scope, the Luminova 114 is plagued with a number of problems. The scope’s optics are the same as the Celestron PowerSeeker 114, making it a surprisingly good performer, actually. The Luminova 114 is a 114mm f/8 Newtonian. Tasco’s customer service ranges from extremely poor to nonexistent, another thing to consider if you’re even thinking about buying one of their telescopes. The yellow-gold color on the tubes isn’t particularly appealing, and it clashes with the black crinkle finish on the rest of the parts. It may just be my personal preference, and the aesthetic appeal should of course not be a top priority when shopping for telescopes, but I think the color choice on the Luminova scopes is awful. Their Amazon descriptions of their telescopes aren’t much better – the 114mm bills itself as a Bushnell for some reason in part of the description! Thus, getting correct information proved to be a little difficult at first when I was researching this telescope – everything I’ve read is garbled. The descriptions aren’t even consistent, there are constant grammatical and spelling issues, and all in all it seems like it was designed by middle schoolers. Tasco’s website is laughably bad in quality. That being said, it is not an unusable telescope it’s just not a great one either and you can do far, far better for the price. The Luminova 114 is billed as capable of “675x” and other impossible feats. I was hard-pressed to find any other reviews of the Luminova 114. They no longer occupy the department store or Walmart shelves they once did due to the general decline of the American retail industry and telescope sales as a whole. Today, Tasco is a shell of what it once was, owned by Bushnell. Tasco also sold some of their best telescopes since the Space Race era during that period, such as “StarGuide” GoTo telescopes that were more or less just rebranded Celestron NexStars. So much so, in fact, that when Celestron wasn’t doing so well financially in the early 2000s, Tasco actually bought out the California-based company and revitalized them with flashy marketing and the NexStar line. Tasco’s name has been widely synonymous with “junk” to amateur astronomers since it came on the scene in the 1960s – though they did produce some surprisingly good equatorially mounted refractors back in the 1960s and 1970s, most of what they’ve ever sold has been unsatisfactory, to say the least.ĭespite this, Tasco actually used to be a titan of the amateur/beginner telescope manufacturing industry.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |